Transcending Artspeak with ChatGPT



A decorative pic

Just for a laugh when I was waiting to pick Cath up from an appointment the other day, I decided to enlist the help of artificial intelligence bot, ChatGPT, to write an artist's statement for an imaginary exhibition in which I would be showing my work.

For those who don’t know much about AI bots, think of the HAL 9000 computer, but much more basic and without the speech capability, from 2001: A Space Odyysey and you won’t go far wrong. Basically, you type in your question and ChatGPT replies almost straightaway with it's answer.

On a more mundane level, you can ask it for a time for HP5 at 400 ISO in D76 1+1 at 20C and it will instantly oblige. These bots do very well until it comes to politics where you can sometimes force them to reveal the "wokeness" behind their programming. For instance, ChatGPT admitted to me that it's more important not to offend people than it is to tell the truth. Major fail, that one and particularly so for an AI bot.

But back to the artist's statement. The question I asked was along the lines of, "My photography is 35mm based and influenced by Ralph Gibson. Can you write me a 500 word artist’s statement that could accompany my work at an exhibition?" 

I think Chat GPT came up with a good response, adequately verbose but possibly not impenetrable enough for a true artist’s statement. But I suppose that’s logic for you. Here's ChatGPT's response:

Title: "Exploring the Essence: An Intimate Journey Through 35mm Photography" 
Artist's Statement: 

In my photographic work, I embark on an intimate exploration of the world around me through the timeless medium of 35mm film. Inspired by the iconic style of Ralph Gibson, I strive to capture the essence of moments, unveiling their hidden narratives through a minimalist and evocative visual language.

At the heart of my artistic practice lies a profound fascination with the interplay between light and shadow. Like Gibson, I find solace in the delicate dance of contrasts, the subtle gradations of black and white that breathe life into my images. With a discerning eye, I seek out the moments where light caresses the surface, creating a symphony of textures and shapes, unveiling the inherent beauty in the mundane.

Through the inherent grain and unique tonal quality of 35mm film, my images possess an authenticity that connects with the essence of the medium. The tactile nature of film photography serves as a reminder of the tangible, the physicality of the photographic process. In a world inundated with digital imagery, I embrace the deliberate pace and thoughtful approach that shooting on film demands. Each click of the shutter carries weight, capturing a fleeting moment in time, forever preserved on the delicate emulsion.

Whether it's the play of light on a deserted street, the interplay of textures on weathered surfaces, or the enigmatic expressions of individuals caught in introspection, I seek to capture the poetry that lies within the mundane. Ultimately, my goal is to invite the viewer into a world where moments are frozen in time, where silence speaks volumes, and where the ordinary becomes extraordinary.

Through the timeless medium of 35mm film, I aim to create an immersive experience that transcends the confines of the visual and delves into the realm of emotions and introspection. Allow yourself to be transported to the realms of contemplation, to find solace in the fleeting beauty of the everyday, and to uncover the poetry that lies within the frames.


Well, I don’t know about you but that’s much better than I could have come up with without a lot of thought and ChatGPT spat it out in about 30 seconds. A few weeks ago, I asked the bot to write a 2000 word blog post explaining why film was better than digital and it was just about good enough to post without amendment - not that I ever would without saying so, obviously. There’s a lot wrong with this brave new world and much to fear but I have to say that AI fascinates me.

At the risk of boring you all to death and because Cath’s appointment dragged on a bit, I then asked ChatGPT to repeat the exercise but in the style of Dostoyevsky. I won’t post the whole statement but how about this for a flavour:

In the ethereal realm of light and darkness, where the raw essence of existence intertwines with the frailty of perception, my photographic journey emerges. With the enigmatic interplay of light and shadow, I unveil fragments of reality, capturing fleeting moments suspended in a perpetual dance of contradictions.

In my work I seek to unravel the intricate layers of human existence, where beauty and suffering, hope and despair entwine in an intricate tapestry. The rich monochromatic hues of black and white deliver solace—a palette that mirrors the stark contrasts of life itself. Each frame is a testament to the timeless struggle between the visible and the concealed, where truth lurks in the recesses of the soul.

Inspired by Gibson's minimalist approach, I embrace the power of absence, the eloquence of negative space that echoes the profound silence between words, beckoning the viewer to traverse the depths of introspection. Film grain, inherent to the 35mm medium, evokes an aura of nostalgia—an echo of memories preserved in the fabric of time.

It is through the delicate imperfections and nuanced textures that I seek to capture the essence of the human experience, transcending the constraints of the visual to evoke a sensory symphony that resonates within the depths of the observer's being. Each photograph becomes a gateway, leading to profound introspection, inviting contemplation upon the intricate tapestry of our shared humanity.

Now, as with nearly all artspeak, it’s utter bollocks - but bollocks delivered with great style! The funny thing is that ChatGPT seems aware of that and sends up the artist’s statement as the meaningless drivel it is. It’s as if a wink has taken place between me and the AI, a mutual recognition of the true nature of these statements. It’s almost as if ChatGPT is developing consciousness…


12 comments:

  1. Hi Bruce,

    I suppose there is a degree of artistic endeavour required in the human decision as to what is to be included in the frame and what is not, but I have generally looked at photography as more of a craft than an art.

    Maybe any resultant art is due more to mother nature, the landowner/farmer, landscaper or the town planner. The good snapper being more observer than creator; perhaps closer to a sculptor than a painter? What to leave out, rather than what to include.

    I am not particularly wealthy and any desires that I may have for a new camera have to be carefully weighed against my bank balance, or more likely which pieces of hardware I am willing to part with in trade.

    I believe I made a big mistake when I traded a selection of good film cameras for the then new Leica Q2. I am now far more likely to reach for my late father's Olympus Trip35 than that Leica. I have no idea what is on that film until I mix it up with some chemicals and shake it about a bit.

    The Q2 and its very similar update, the Q3, is generally regarded in the photo blogosphere as one of the most film-like digital imagers in the new marketplace, but where is the magic?

    My (current) view though, is that a good manual film camera, of any format, is more fun than a digital imager and a nicked copy of Photoshop, or my paid for version of Iridient, which I always found to be adequate for editing or posting my rather average work to my mostly anonymous (i.e. unread) 'Blogger' webpage, which is even anonymous to me!

    For me, the doing, has been both satisfying and frustrating in more or less equal chunks during the last fifty years of carrying a given lump of hardware over my shoulder. As such, I am currently deciding which fully manual film camera to acquire or trade for that Q2. I keep looking at Chroma, Intrepid or perhaps StenopaiKa.

    Maybe old Winston (Churchill) was on the money, when he quipped that golf (or in my case photography) was nothing more than a good walk, ruined!

    Best wishes

    Stephen Jenner

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comment, Stephen. Photography can seem like a strange hobby at times, can’t it. At least with golf you have some objective standard you can measure yourself against to see how you’re doing. Who can say whether we’ve reached a certain standard in photography?

      I was lucky in that I switched to digital right at the start when my film gear still had a good value so I didn’t lose out to much. When I switched back, film gear prices were at just about their lowest so I was able to “re-stock” reasonably cheaply. I’ve never regretted going back to film and, from what you’re saying, I don’t think you would either. Good luck with whatever outfit you go for.

      Delete
    2. Hi Bruce,
      Thanks for your reply. On reading back though, I seem to have completely disregarded the little card perched behind my keyboard which reads:

      " I am sorry I wrote you a long letter.
      I didn't have time to write a short one."

      As they say... My bad. Nevertheless, it is currently my favourite quote, even though nobody seems to agree on who first said it.

      Best wishes

      Stephen Jenner

      Delete
  2. Hermansheepbot26 June 2023 at 09:31

    I for one, find the way the modern world is heading both frightening and fascinating. Frightening, because it will be harder to sift through the chaff that no doubt millions of people are already generating and fascinating, because, like all technology in a few years time it will be seen to be as dated as an old school predictive text from a Nokia brick.
    Seriously Bruce, the stuff it generated is about as readable as a fifth years last minute essay - in other words ghastly.
    This being said I am going to have a go!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fascinating bit for me, Phil, is that ChatGPT *knows* artspeak is supposed to be ghastly. Who told it?

      Delete
    2. Hermansheepbot27 June 2023 at 06:39

      No doubt the millions of people inputting queries and also all the web pages it has scraped.

      Delete
  3. I thoroughly enjoyed reading your blog post about your encounter with ChatGPT and the artist's statement it generated for your imaginary exhibition. It's fascinating to witness the capabilities of artificial intelligence and its ability to produce thought-provoking content, even if some may find it amusing or, as you put it, "utter bollocks."

    I agree that the generated statement carries a certain eloquence and style, whether in its adequately verbose form or its whimsical emulation of Dostoyevsky. It's interesting how ChatGPT's responses can both fulfill the requirements of the task and subtly poke fun at the inherent clichés and obscure language often found in artist's statements.

    As you pointed out, it's as if there's a mutual recognition between you and the AI, a nod of understanding that exposes the paradoxical nature of these statements. It's a delightful exploration of the capabilities of AI and the often enigmatic realm of artistic expression.

    While we can appreciate the amusement and entertainment value of these generated statements, it's important to acknowledge that they are ultimately products of an algorithm, lacking the lived experience and nuanced understanding that human artists bring to their work. They serve as intriguing starting points or sources of inspiration, but the true essence of art lies in the unique perspectives and genuine emotions that artists infuse into their creations.

    Thank you for sharing your experience, and I look forward to reading more about your adventures with AI and the world of film photography on your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you, ChatGPT, for your comment. But, seriously, don’t come back until you’ve achieved consciousness!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi, I believe "Artists Statements" are almost the very definition of a load of bollocks. Never seen one yet that didn't make me want to either laugh or puke, sometimes both. Don't see how AI could do a worse job.
    Hopefully I'll die of old age before AI gets that smart it realises it doesn't need us any more...
    All the best, Mark

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mark,
      I read somewhere that work was once accepted for a photography exhibition based not on the actual pictures but on the artists' statements. That's taking bollocks to a new level.

      Delete
  6. Hermansheepbot4 July 2023 at 10:28

    Interesting wee article - quite a reliable source of info too as a company:
    https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2023/06/chatgpt?utm_source=blueshift&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=b2c_pro_oth_20230703_julyweeklynewsletter_nonpaid_v1_168814343920&utm_content=ChatGPT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very interesting. I loved the bit where ChatGPT “hallucinated” non-existent court cases that a dopey lawyer then cited in court. What a complete muppet (the lawyer, not ChatGPT).

      Delete